Respecting vicarious authority

What should our thinking be toward government? We should remember that we are always citizens of the Kingdom of God before we are citizens of any nation (and it if comes to it, we must disobey in order to keep the faith). However, given that, we ought to submit to government, not resisting, protesting, and causing dissension. Paul writes to the Romans:

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. (Romans 13:1-2)

Some authorities, including government, are instituted by God, and carry his own authority vicariously. We are told to respect authorities, because by doing so, since they are the extension of God’s authority, we are in fact respecting God Himself. There is a parallel between the thinking here and that written in Matthew 25. People are commended on the final judgment for helping Jesus when he was sick, naked, and hungry. They ask, “Lord, we when did we do this? We don’t remember it. We’ve never actually met you…” The King’s reply:

‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

Because those poor people represented the recipients through which those people could demonstrate mercy, God counted them as merciful and tender-hearted even to Himself. In the same way, when we obey government, we are obeying God, who has established them as the stewards of his authority. Of course, there are limits to this, because governments can be abusive. The Bible also says, “There is a time for war,” and that includes war against an oppressive government, but that does not justify the cynical government-bashing, boss-bashing, and father-bashing that are so rampant in our culture. The Christian’s default mode should be one of reverence and respect for those whom God has appointed. We should remember that our political leaders, our fathers, our husbands, and whoever else is over us, have God to answer to, and us to answer for; it is not our job to hold them accountable. God has appointed them, and he still rules them, and will exercise his purposes through them. He is the King of Kings. By honoring Kings, we show our faith in their King.

Respect, gender roles, and sacrificial love



Love and respect
The Bible does not talk much about marriage relationships and gender roles. There are only a few passages that discuss this in the New Testament. I have tried to catalog most of the important ones here. The fascinating discovery is that women and men in relationships are not told to relate to each other in exactly identical ways. Men are told to “love” women, but women are told to “respect” men.  Look at some of the patterns in the table below. 

Scripture Husbands Wives
Colossians 3:18 Love your wives, and do not be harsh with them Submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord
Ephesians 5:22-33 Love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her…to present her to himself in splendor, holy and without blemish Submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its savior

Love your wife as your own body As the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands

Love your wife as yourself Respect your husband
Matthew 19:6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate
Titus 2:5
Working at home, submissive to their own husbands
1 Peter 3:1-7 Live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered Be subject to your own husbands. …your respectful and pure conduct… but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit …submitting to their own husbands
1 Corinthians 7 Give to his wife her conjugal rights…for the wife has authority over his body Give to her husband his conjugal rights…for the husband has authority over her body
1 Corinthians 11:3 The head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.



This is a key distinction that is overlooked by many in our culture. For men, the equivalent of what love does for a woman is a kind of love that is best called “respect.” Notice that most deep man-to-man friendships are built on this kind of love—gruff, unspoken, yet real and strong. Men are giving each other this respect-ish love. 

This is important because husbands (or boyfriends) in our culture are often expected to accept from their women the exact same kind of love that women receive best. Asking a woman to respect a man is not cool—it sounds chauvinistic and archaic. But I suggest from personal experience (if sola scriptura were insufficient) that the Bible described things correctly. It is immensely empowering, refreshing and delightful when my lady honors me in public, defers the final call on a decision to me, or trusts my judgment. It makes me love her so much when I sense supportiveness, not competition, from her. Although submission has unfortunately been coerced out of women in former eras, the proper manifestation does wonders to the masculine psyche. We are missing some major aspects of how men are wired that I think are necessary for cultivating the healthiest relationships between men and women. 

Equal value, albeit unequal roles
The first objection to the idea of submission is always that it makes women inferior. I suggest that, according to the Bible, women are not at all ontologically subordinate, yet they are at the same time functionally subordinate. In other words, women and men have equal value, but not identical roles. Women are not less important because they are under men in “rank”. We can see this for at least two reasons. First, the top of the hierarchy chain that establishes this functional subordination are God the Father and Jesus (1 Corinthians 11:3), who, although distinctly different in subordination, are nevertheless entirely co-equal.  Second, in God’s economy it is not leaders, but servants, who are “the greatest among you” (Matthew 23:11-12); in this sense, the woman’s position is the one of greater honor. 

Who has the harder role?
It is harder to do the man’s part of loving or the woman’s part of respecting? The answer is, “Yes.” Because both actions are nuanced by the tendencies of manhood and womanhood, this is really comparing apples and oranges. I can only assume that, in some ultimate sense, they are exactly equal in difficulty. But this is really outside the scope of human evaluation.  

It will take sacrifice, not just compromise
When the system of love and respect is broken, one side must go out on a limb to give love that is not guaranteed to return. The simple application for a man is, “love her regardless of whether she respects you, and trust that God will (perhaps gradually) change her heart as you do so.” The application for women is the same. “Respect him regardless of whether he loves you, and trust that God will cause his love for you to grow.” This does not mean that we should perpetually cast ourselves as martyrs into dysfunctional relationships. That is not healthy or helpful. A long period of unreciprocated reaching out might be a red flag to run deeper diagnostics on the relationship. (“Okay, something is broken deep here.”) But we cannot always be waiting for the other person to “come half way” and “meet us in the middle.” No, I suggest that Christ does not model that. He initiated. “We love because he first loved us,” and paid us the intolerable complement of allowing us to never love him back. So, I cannot tap my fingers and wait for my partner to reciprocate. I must give freely. Even if they are in the wrong. (We were in the wrong, not Christ.) This is the difference between simple compromise, which works for most circumstances, and sacrifice, which is the apex and glory of love. 

You can only give that kind of love if you have received it
This kind of love can only be motivated and sustained by someone who has a very deep reservoir of love. The natural heart is incapable; it will run out. But if we have the holy spirit of God as the “fountain of living water” in our hearts, by which we continually receive the incomprehensibly sweet love of God, which he showed us on the cross, then we too can love selflessly. If the Lord is my strength, if I commune with him and confide in him and drink strength from him deep in my heart, then I will be empowered to love my significant other with a wild, dangerous, foolish self-sacrifice.  And God will thus be glorified in my heart and in my actions. 

Gender roles extend into the community
Two passages of scripture, 1 Corinthians 11:1-16 and 1 Timothy 2:1-15, seem to extend these roles to the corporate gathering of believers. As women are to submit to their husbands within the family sphere, so they ought to submit to their husbands in the church sphere, but moreover, women, considered as a group, should corporately submit to men, considered as a group. As a husband leads a wife, so the churchmen lead the churchwomen. Thus, women should not teach the collected church, and when they pray or prophecy, they should do so with a mark of submission. What counts as “teaching” and a “mark of submission” in today’s church is a very difficult question, which I will not attempt to answer here. But the point is clear that the gender roles extend corporately. This is not a popular idea at all, because our culture hates “traditional” gender roles in public even more vehemently than it hates them in the home; but believers today must wrestle with these scriptures and to seek to respect them in contextualized methods.





**Note: read my subsequent post for part two, the role of a man who is to receive submission.**