A while ago I went to a lecture at Virginia Tech from a guest professor, Dr. James Anderson, entitled “Why Universities Can’t Do Without God: The theistic foundations of modern education and research.” Let me try to get the gist of his argument down.
(1) The existence of universities assumes the existence of two things: rational thought and objective moral standards.
Dr. Anderson pointed out that things like university honor codes, the protection of intellectual property rights, and expectations for the behavior of students, faculty and staff, are all based on the assumption that objective moral standards exist. As if to corroborate his point, about a week after the lecture, I got an email that was distributed to the entire VT community announcing the 2012 rights and responsibilities of the Virginia Tech community. It set forth strong moral expectations for everyone in the community. Furthermore, I got an email about a university-wide initiative to support charities, with the encouragement to “have a heart and do our part” – an appeal to moral virtues like selflessness and generosity.
Secondly, Anderson pointed out that rational thought is an assumed foundation upon which the university is built. Academic discourse and scientific inquiry in any field of research attempts to articulate, ascertain and define realities. The principles or reason and argument are inherent. Truth values for statements are assumed.
The next part of his argument is constructed in modus tollens. He argues that, if God does not exist, these two things could not exist either. To show this, he quotes four prominent atheist philosophers who discuss the implications of an honest, consistent atheistic worldview on the issues of objective morality and rational thought.
[at this point my notes vanish. Oh well, I present the above for what it’s worth]